The Next Uranium Supercycle? Energy Fuels & IsoEnergy on Geopolitics, Mills, and Market Gaps

**The Next Uranium Supercycle? Insights from Energy Fuels and IsoEnergy on Geopolitics, Mills, and Market Gaps**

As the global energy landscape shifts towards decarbonization and energy security, the uranium sector appears poised for a significant upward trajectory. A recent interview on Crux Investor with Mark Chalmers, President and CEO of Energy Fuels Inc., and Marty Tunney, COO of IsoEnergy Ltd., sheds light on the emerging dynamics that could propel uranium into a new supercycle. With recording date May 30, 2025, the discussion underscores the confluence of supply constraints, political backing, and surging nuclear demand shaping the future of uranium markets.

### Supply-Demand Fundamentals: A Looming Shortage

One of the most compelling themes from the interview is the fundamental supply-demand imbalance. Chalmers emphasizes that many high-grade uranium deposits are nearing depletion, and the remaining viable projects face significantly higher development costs. "Some of the best deposits are being mined right now and are depleting themselves," he notes. This depletion underscores a looming supply shortage that could persist for years, even if prices rise sufficiently to incentivize new production.

Current spot prices hover around $60-70 per pound, well below the estimated $100+ per pound needed to motivate substantial new mine development. The gap indicates a considerable lag—given the lengthy timelines involved in exploration, permitting, infrastructure setup, and reclamation—before new supply can meet rising demand. This structural delay suggests that prices could remain elevated over the medium to long term once the supply-demand gap becomes more pronounced.

### Political Support as a Catalyst

What sets uranium apart from many other commodities is its robust, bipartisan political backing. Governments worldwide recognize nuclear energy's role in achieving energy security and reducing carbon emissions. U.S. presidential executive orders have reinforced commitments to domestic critical mineral production, including uranium, signaling strong political momentum.

Chalmers highlights that support from both sides of the political aisle is fueling renewed interest in nuclear power, including emerging technologies like small modular reactors (SMRs). Such projects promise more flexible and scalable nuclear solutions, further bolstering long-term demand.

Additionally, geopolitical tensions intensify the urgency of securing uranium supplies. The upcoming ban on Russian uranium imports into Western markets, set to take effect in 2028, is expected to accelerate supply shortfalls. Industry insiders anticipate that supply disruptions may occur even sooner due to geopolitical pressures and strategic stockpiling.

Meanwhile, China’s aggressive nuclear expansion—aiming to construct reactors rapidly—adds to the demand pressure. With the capacity to build reactors in approximately 18 months, China exemplifies a fast-growing market that Western nations are keen to compete with or complement.

### Established Producers and Infrastructure Advantage

The market dynamics favor well-established uranium producers with existing production infrastructure. Companies like Energy Fuels benefit from strategic assets such as the White Mesa Mill—the only conventional uranium processing facility in the United States. This mill serves as a critical processing bottleneck, generating high-margin toll processing revenue for Energy Fuels and providing a competitive edge.

Conversely, many newer or junior uranium companies face operational challenges and lack processing access. IsoEnergy’s Tunney notes, “If you don’t have access to the White Mesa Mill and you’re a hard rock miner in the U.S., you don’t have anywhere in the next five to seven years to process your ore.” This infrastructure constraint underscores the importance of established processing capacity in positioning companies to benefit from rising prices.

### Technical and Operational Advantages

Recent operational issues faced by in-situ recovery (ISR) uranium projects highlight the advantages of conventional hard rock mining. Conventional mining offers greater control, cost predictability, and operational flexibility—attributes increasingly valued as the industry navigates complex technical and regulatory landscapes.

### Investment Outlook

The confluence of these factors creates a compelling investment thesis centered on a structural supply-demand imbalance, reinforced by geopolitical and infrastructural constraints. Companies with proven production capabilities, strategic processing assets, and robust operational histories are positioned to capitalize on the emerging market conditions.

The broader outlook suggests a potential for a sustained uranium supercycle driven by rising demand, constrained supply, and supportive political frameworks. North American producers, in particular, stand to benefit from their strategic infrastructure and closer alignment with domestic policy priorities.

### Conclusion

While uranium prices remain below the levels that would trigger significant new mine development, the combination of supply constraints, geopolitical tensions, and political backing indicates that a fundamental shift could be on the horizon. Investors and industry stakeholders should monitor how these elements evolve, as they are likely to define the next chapter of uranium’s market trajectory.

For more insights, visit Crux Investor or sign up for updates at [Crux Investor](https://cruxinvestor.com).